"Codenomicon Lab's core focus is to empower the decision makers to provide better quality software and better quality products"

Codenomicon Labs

< categories

Wireless Access Points

Whitepaper on Wireless Security

This paper draws from the past and current state of existing wireless technologies and reflects experiences with emerging technologies. It describes how robustness-testing techniques can be used to assess the security of the available implementations and give statistics about the current state of affairs of Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Quality and reliability improvements in these implementations will lead directly to decreased development and deployment costs, as well as increased public acceptance and faster adoption.

> Download the whitepaper here

Results

Result Device Version Tested protocols Known vulnerabilities
Bad Apple Airport Extreme V5.7 802.11, IPv4, ARP, DHCP
Ugly Buffalo Airstation Ver.1.40 802.11, IPv4, ARP, DHCP, RIP, HTTP
Bad D-Link WBR-1310 2.00 802.11, IPv4, ARP, HTTP, TCP
Ugly FON FON2100A/B/C 0.7.0 r4 802.11, IPv4, HTTP
Bad Siemens Gigaset SE361 802.11, ARP, DHCP, HTTP, TCP
Ugly TPLink WA501G 2.12.5 802.11, IPv4, ARP, DHCP, HTTP, TCP
Ugly Zyxel G-570S V1.00 (ZJ.3) C0 802.11, IPv4, ARP, DHCP, HTTP

Results definition: The Verdict

Result Description
Excellent Excellent: No service interruption or outage was experienced. No issues experienced while testing.
Good Good: The device showed a level of service degradation during the test, but no service interruption was experienced.
Bad Bad: The device or processes reset but came back up, there was a service interruption. Highly likely the issues can be exploited and personal data accessed. Can be protected with WEP/WPA. Potentially exploitable beyond denial of service.
Ugly Ugly: The device or processes reset, was killed, or never came back up. Highly likely the issues can be exploited and personal data accessed. No protection measures. Potentially exploitable beyond denial of service.